I received a number of responses
to my original post about the actions of the Anglican bishops to suspend the
American church from the ill-defined body called the Anglican Communion. They are
prompting me to think further about this situation. I always consider that a
gift.
No time to play the role of victims
One response came from the former
rector of the parish in California in which I was ordained. Jerry is a long-time
mentor and currently heads a mission in San Jose to refugees from the conflict
in the Sudan. He has been an indispensable advocate and ombudsman for the “lost
boys” of the Sudan who have been resettled in the South Bay for a couple of
decades now. It is truly a remarkable ministry.
In his reflections on the suspension
of the American church, Jerry recalls the history of the Anglican worldwide
experience with the locus of power and influence passing from the UK to the US
church in the 1950s but by the 1990s moving to the churches of the Global South.
As he well puts it, “It is to be expected that the new center would exercise
its muscles.”
Indeed. And it’s not
necessarily a bad thing for us Americans to be in a place where we are no longer
in control of things. Some of my most important lessons in life have arisen
from circumstances where as a first world white man of privilege I was in the
control of others.
Jerry raises an important
point about how the American church should respond: “The danger would be to
fall into the role of being a victim, which would be to act out the role
assigned to us by the accusers.” Indeed. This is precisely the point I was
making in my previous blog entry suggesting that the American church place some
safe distance between itself and the institution that insists upon abusing it.
As I have thought about this
it has occurred to me that at some level, the “sanctions” the bishops approved
are not necessarily a bad thing. The American church will not be chairing
committees or helping hammer out issues of policy through voting presence there.
Truth be told, to a recent retiree that sounds like a welcome relief from a lot
of responsibility. The To Do list for
the American church is hardly empty.
The final sanction is the
prohibition of the American church from representing the Communion in
interfaith dialogues and gatherings. In all fairness, that probably is also a
blessing in disguise. On the one hand, why would the American church want to represent a body marked by its resolute
embrace of sexism and homophobia? On the other hand, how could the American church authentically represent such a body given
its own long and painful spiritual journey through those very demons of
prejudice to become a more inclusive church?
Of course that leaves people
like Jerry and Pam, a fellow parishioner who has done a beautiful job in creating
solar lighting and windmill projects in Tanzania, in a difficult place. The
ministries that they and thousands of other Episcopalians are doing in the very
places whose bishops have just approved this hateful action are way too
important to be abandoned. The needs of
the people are a much greater concern than the fragile egos of church leaders,
both in the Global South and here at home.
“We love your people even as we fear
your government…”
As I was thinking about this
distinction between the people in a given place and the leadership which
presumes to speak for them and act on their behalf, I was taken back to my own
visits to Latin America. One of the most painful days of my life came in April 1992
in the countryside of El Salvador at the end of the war there. As an Episcopal
seminarian, I was there under the auspices of the Episcopal Church in El Salvador
and the World Council of Churches whose volunteers were monitoring the
ceasefire which had just taken effect.
One of our observations took
us into the Conflicted Zone well outside the capital, San Salvador, whose demilitarized
limits were patrolled by the blue helmeted United Nations peacekeepers. As we
drove past the UN troops with a wave, we headed into countryside marked by
signs warning us not to leave the highway because of the mines planted there, houses
and churches destroyed by artillery and hillsides blackened right down to the
bare stone by napalm dropped from helicopters.
One of the base communities
we visited had become a safe haven for SalvadoreƱos burned by the napalm. The
scar tissue on their exposed arms and faces was horrific, painful to even look
at. The napalm had been dropped from government helicopters which, along with
the napalm, had been provided by the US government. Our so-called “freedom
fighters” had been very effective angels of death.
But how had these folks
survived? Their burns had clearly been third degree, life-threatening wounds. “The
Cuban doctors saved us,” they responded to a person.
Suddenly my own world spun
out of orbit. I was taken back to my childhood in Central Florida where we fourth
graders were being taught to duck and cover, to stick our heads in our desks
when we heard the explosion of nuclear bombs to prevent our eyes from being put
out by glass and debris. And over and over we were reminded that the bombs in
Castro’s Cuba were only a mere 90 minutes from us. To paraphrase the question
Jesus’ disciples pose about becoming his disciples in John’s Gospel, How could anything good come out of Havana?
Later that afternoon we
visited a base community named for the daughter of the housekeeper of the
Jesuit professors at the University of Central America who had been slaughtered
along with her mother and the priests by paramilitary assassins trained in and
armed by the US funded and directed School of the Americas. One of the
villagers saw us coming, raced up and took my hand and said, “Come with us, we
want to show you something.”
Photo by Amando Trull/WAMU
At the top of the hill there
was a fuselage of a helicopter which had been raised up and affixed to the tops
of a copse of trees. This was the helicopter that had dropped the napalm on
them, they told us, shot down by an FMLN rebel rocket. My former LA cop (and
now bishop) classmate looked over the helicopter and immediately noted its origin:
“It’s a Hughey. It’s one of ours,” he said.
Again, my world went
spinning out of control. It was no longer possible to avoid the implications of
the revelations of this day. It was the Cuban doctors, the people from the
country I had learned to hate and mistrust, who had been the
agents of healing here. And it was the people from my own country, the American
“security” agents who had taught the military and paramilitary these techniques
of terrorism and supplied them with the weaponry to carry it out, who had been
the angels of death.
For the remainder of my time
in El Salvador I struggled to come to grips with how these embattled people who
housed us, fed us and so graciously shared their lives with us could even
countenance citizens of the country which had done so much harm to their
families, friends and communities. But when I asked that question, I was told
repeatedly, “Your government is one thing. Your people are another. We love
your people even as we fear your government.”
Clearly, it is possible to separate the people
of a country from the leadership who purports to speak for them and act on
their behalf. The needs of the suffering to which every follower of Jesus is
called to respond do not go away because the religious leaders feel the need to
“exercise [their] muscle” in an international body.
There is no small amount of
irony in the recognition that as concerns about how the American church deals
with issues of sexuality have become the obsession of the Global South bishops,
it is the faithful work of first world projects, many of them led and funded by
American Episcopalians, which have sought to respond to the many needs of the
peoples of the Global South. Daily these volunteers directly confront the nightmares
of HIV, poverty, a flood of war refugees and massive environmental degradation which
threaten to swallow up the very people the bishops supposedly represent and
they often do so at no small risk to their own lives.
Love in conflict with power often leads
to crucifixion
Jerry ended his note to me
with this statement: “We are not about to abandon our relationships with South
Sudanese because of the actions of the primates.” I suspect that’s true of
every American partner of a Global South people including the work my own
parish is doing in the Diocese of Kondoa, Tanzania. This will hardly be the first
time the imperative of loving one’s neighbor as oneself has trumped the imperatives
of religious authorities intent on reassuring themselves of their own importance.
But it is essential to
remember that when love comes into conflict with power, the result is often
some form of crucifixion. As Massachusetts Bishop Barbara Harris once remarked, “They
didn’t kill Jesus for asking the little children to come to him.” The question
that we Episcopalians are now answering is simply how much our hard won
principles are worth to us.
In that light, it is highly
encouraging to see our own leadership’s response to this action by the Anglican
bishops. The Presiding Bishop of The Episcopal Church, Michael
Curry, has been very candid in acknowledging the painfulness of the
bishops’ actions as well as the resolute determination of the American church
to both remain present in the Communion even as it refuses to walk away from
the progressive changes in our church polity which prompted the suspension in
the first place.
This is not the outcome we expected, and while we are
disappointed, it’s important to remember that the Anglican Communion is really
not a matter of structure and organization. The Anglican Communion is a network
of relationships that have been built on mission partnerships; relationships
that are grounded in a common faith; relationships in companion diocese
relationships; relationships with parish to parish across the world;
relationships that are profoundly committed to serving and following the way of
Jesus of Nazareth by helping the poorest of the poor, and helping this world to
be a place where no child goes to bed hungry ever. That’s what the Anglican
Communion is, and that Communion continues and moves forward.
In the bigger picture, while
the actions of the Anglican bishops are hurtful to an American church whose
commitment to inclusivity has been hard won and painfully realized over the
last half century, they are simultaneously a source of shame for the bishops
who pounded out this resolution. In a world where sexism and homophobia are
increasingly unacceptable vestiges of cultural understandings whose time has
passed, drawing a line in the sand to hold onto values no longer seen as
tenable by increasing numbers of people today is a losing gambit. This is
particularly true of the rising Millennial generation who want no part of any church
which confuses common social prejudices with religion. This reality, too, is slowly
but surely coming to a Global South church near you.
The leadership of the churches
of the southern hemisphere, whose politics reveal a failure to develop beyond
the limited understandings of the evangelical missionaries of the 19th
CE who planted those churches, will increasingly find themselves within circled
wagons talking only among themselves. Such a reality will make an ever greater
mockery of any claims to be a world-wide communion.
Perhaps the witness of the
American Presiding Bishop and bishops from the churches in Canada, the UK, New
Zealand and Australia can make a difference in this reality over time. If the
experience of The Episcopal Church is any indication, it will be a long,
painful process. There may be multiple crucifixions before this is over.
I admire Michael Curry’s sense of dedication to this calling. I wish him well in the process. And my prayers, contributions and energies will remain with all of those who seek to love mercy, do justice and walk humbly with G-d among the peoples of the Global South.
I admire Michael Curry’s sense of dedication to this calling. I wish him well in the process. And my prayers, contributions and energies will remain with all of those who seek to love mercy, do justice and walk humbly with G-d among the peoples of the Global South.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Harry Scott Coverston
Orlando, Florida
If the unexamined
life is not worth living, surely an unexamined belief system, be it religious
or political, is not worth holding.
Most things worth
considering do not come in sound bites.
For what does G-d
require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with
your G-d? (Micah 6:8, Hebrew Scriptures)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++