Red sky in the morning, sailor’s
warning; red sky at night, sailor’s delight.
– Old rule of thumb for forecasting
weather
One of the sites I follow on
Facebook identifies itself as Storm is Coming. Ostensibly it is a site devoted to all things Bernie
Sanders. But the title of the site and the tenor of the postings really points
toward something different, something a bit more ominous.
There is a sense in the posts
on this site that America, perhaps the world itself, is headed toward some kind
of devolution into chaos. I also get the sense that while the Storm these folks
see coming could be preventable, it’s unlikely that we Americans will turn away
from the precipice prior to hurtling over the rim of the abyss.
In all honesty, I do not want
to believe that. But I am not able to convince myself at this point that these
prophets of doom are wrong. And I am not alone with that discomfort.
I just got off the phone with a former Republican member of
Congress who says he “can’t believe” Trump won all of today’s primaries. “I
don’t get it,” he said. “The Republican Party is completely out of control.”
Earlier today I spoke with a Hillary supporter who asked me
to urge Bernie to get out of the race. “He can’t win, and the longer he stays
in the harder he’s making it for Hillary in the general [election],” she said.
“I just don’t get it.”
Neither of the people I spoke with “get” the biggest single
force in the 2016 election: a furious revolt against the political
establishment.
The revolt has taken two very different forms – progressive
populism (Bernie's "political revolution") and authoritarian populism
(Donald Trump’s bloviated bigotry). They are the positive and negative sides of
the same coin.
Both should be wake-up calls for America’s two major
political parties and the corporate and financial elites that have sponsored
them for decades. Unless or until the establishment responds to the growing
frustrations of a shrinking and increasingly insecure middle class, the
populist revolt – its reformist zeal on one side, and its hatefulness on the
other – will only intensify in coming years.
Reich’s final paragraph
bespeaks much of the apprehension I feel at the moment. What we are seeing in
this election should be a wake-up
call. The level of violence at the Trump rallies including the confrontation of
demonstrators with police outside the Orange County, CA event last
night is alarming. The tone of the campaign rhetoric has become equally
alarming with the former Republican Speaker of the House saying of the second
place candidate for his party’s nomination that he’d be elected “over my dead
body.” I almost find myself pining for the early days of the campaign when penis
comparisons and menstrual references were the common fare.
As a friend described it, this
is much like watching a looming train wreck. We are unable to bear the
impending sight but we are too fascinated with it to turn away.
They simply don’t get it
One of the things I do out of
love for my 89 year old Dad is endure his obsession with Fox while I am at his
house. As much as I try to ignore the loud chattering (my Dad keeps the TV
turned up so he can hear it) of the talking heads on Fox, a few of the comments
managed to get through my defense line of crossword puzzles and online
solitaire Tuesday night.
One of the commentators noted
the exit polling in Pennsylvania where a majority of Republicans there felt
the current activities of Wall Street hurts the country as a whole. The polling
data demonstrated that voters in Pennsylvania, who were considerably less
likely than those in states like Connecticut and Delaware to earn more than
$100,000/year, were also much more likely to see Wall Street as injurious to
their daily lives. Most of these folks voted for Trump.
I was amused by the flummoxed
Fox pundit who repeatedly asserted something to the effect of “How could anyone
think that the greatest economy in the world’s history is harmful to their
interests?” as if it were revealed truth. It was Lou Dobs who continually
reminded the sputtering spokesperson for free market fundamentalism that one’s
socio-economic location makes a great deal of difference in how one sees the
economic status quo.
Cui bono?
Good for whom and at whose expense?
I am hardly surprised that
conservative ideologues are shocked to discover that the economic system which
has provided them with often largely unearned privilege at the expense of many
whose largely undervalued labor produces that privilege could be seen as
harmful. As social critic Upton Sinclair observed at the height of the last
Robber Baron era during the 1920s, “It is
difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his
not understanding it.”
What was striking in this
exchange, however, was the vehemence in the denial of the reality the polling
data was revealing. As Reich notes in his discussions with both Republican and
Democratic loyalists, these are people who simply don’t “‘get’ the biggest
single force in the 2016 election: a furious revolt against the political
establishment.” And it is precisely that cluelessness and denial that prompt
folks like the Facebook posters to warn us that a “Storm is Coming.”
Institutions past expiration dates
The “furious revolts” that
Reich observes confirms my sense that the US - and perhaps the world generally -
stands on the brink of a major transformative stage in its history. As I have
said here previously, while many are prone to construct this point in history
as a time when our institutions are broken or failed, reacting in anger and
furiously seeking others to blame, in fact those institutions have simply
reached their natural expiration dates. The time for change has come.
Clearly, the status quo has
served at least some of our interests in the past or it would never have come
into being and remained intact. But all innovations have their points of
inception and their points of decline. It is when the expiration date of an institution
has been reached and the parties who are accustomed to that status quo fail to
respond that the potential for “furious revolts” arises.
As I see it, virtually all of
our institutions are beyond their expiration dates.
·
Our system of electoral politics - with its
barriers to participation, its money-driven interminable media campaigns and
its hierarchies of power proxies from super-delegates to the nameless and
faceless members of the electoral college – no longer serves “we, the people.” America
has ceased to be a functioning democracy as former President Jimmy Carter has observed.
·
Our educational systems with their
obsessions with assessment, the standardized test driven pedagogies it produces
and the standardized – but largely uncritical and uncreative – minds it
produces, no longer serve our children. A generation of bottom liners who
learned early on to hate the schools and universities that served corporate
needs at the expense of their own developmental needs will spend a lifetime
recovering from this abuse and resenting those who heaped it upon them.
·
Our economic system has produced the most
unequal society in American history. With that inequality has come social
instability, the breakdown of social cohesiveness and the crime and acrimony
that self-focused individuals inevitably in conflict generate. Our workers do
not make living wages and our higher education graduates spend lifetimes enslaved to debt. This paradigm clearly no longer “serves the common good.”
·
Our religious institutions no longer
inspire hope or provide meaning. Both science and religion have lost their way
in largely contrived conflicts between them resulting in dueling
fundamentalisms that have provoked terrorism on the one hand and mass exits
from institutional expressions of religion on the other. Rabid refusal of
religious bodies to confront the confusion of social prejudices with religion and
the dogmatic understandings that inform them has disenchanted those with the
capacity to think critically and feel compassionately. They have voted with
their feet. The time has come for a new way of being homo religioso.
·
Our willingness to
ignore the changes in our planet’s
climate is no longer a luxury humanity can indulge. The challenges of
sustainable energy sources and confronting the collateral damage of the war
already waged on our planet’s ecosystems must command humanity’s attention for
the foreseeable future. The time has come for a new way of being human
vis-à-vis “this fragile earth our island home.”
What people like Bernie
Sanders recognize is that our window to act, to avoid the Storm that will surely
come should the current crisis in legitimacy in virtually every aspect of
collective human endeavors be ignored, is rapidly closing. An old classmate of
mine from high school who, like myself and Reich, has supported the Sanders
campaign noted yesterday on Facebook, “A coup can happen overnight. A
revolution takes a little longer.”
I think there is wisdom in
that observation. Indeed, I think the revolution has been underway for a while
now. But it has fallen well short of its desired goals.
Wasted opportunities
The 2008 Obama campaign
focused on two ideals: hope and change. Indeed, I type these words below my framed copy of the
famous HOPE poster of Obama hanging on my office wall. Like many Americans, I
had enormous hopes when he was elected that change would come to America.
In all fairness, some change
has occurred. My marriage to my partner of now approaching 42 years is one
aspect of that change. The drawdowns in Iraq and Afghanistan and the resistance to the saber rattlers' calls to invade Syria and to bomb Iran are also aspects of
that change even as the liberal use of weaponized drones continues to wreak
havoc around the world. America got by with only a moderate depression caused
by the latest failure of the free market fundamentalist model in 2008 only
because Obama negotiated a largely rotten deal to bail out Wall Street at the
expense of Main Street. And while a majority of people in America are not happy
with the Affordable Care Act, the truth is that many people who previously had
no access to medical care now do, almost like in a regular first world nation.
But, like many of us who dared
to HOPE with Obama’s election, our hopes have largely been drowned in a tidal
wave of mindless
Republican opposition that announced the day of his inauguration that their only
focus would be to thwart anything Obama proposed regardless of what it was or
how it impacted the American people. As a result, Washington has essentially
shut down – once quite literally – for the last eight years.
There is a reason the revolts
Reich observes are furious and I fear they will be increasingly so.
With the soft revolution of
Obama largely stopped in its tracks, I had hoped that Bernie Sanders might
offer a way out of this morass. His willingness to articulate the places where
our current electoral, economic and educational systems have reached their
limits and must be transformed connected with many voters. His appreciation of
the increasing role diversity in our population will play in determining our
future was always palpable. His vision of the future connected with the Millennial Generation which as of yesterday became the largest cohort in our
country surpassing the Boomers.
But, it appears Bernie’s
revolution, struggling to appeal to voters beyond his base of largely well
educated white folks and Gen Y Millennials, will not be coming to a polling
place near you in November. Instead, we will have two representatives of the
status quo facing off in what is likely to be the nastiest and costliest
election in US history.
This is where I begin worrying about a coming Storm.
One place I disagree with Bernie
is his summation of Hillary’s qualifications. She is certainly qualified to run
a government under the status quo system. But if the status quo is the problem,
as I and many other furious revolutionaries see it, that is not an adequate
answer to the problems we face. It is simply more of the same, a prolonging of
the current agony.
But I am not at all certain
that Hillary Clinton can win this election. Mr. Trump has an enormous war chest
at his behest and his corporate buddies will spare no expense in soft money painting
Hillary in demonic tones. She will be absolutely unrecognizable before the
campaign is over and frankly after the experience with George Bush, I no longer
have a lot of confidence in the American voters to see through that haze. Even
if she wins, unless there is an unforeseen sweep of Congress by the Democrats,
unlikely given the gerrymandered House districts, President Hillary will face a
Congress at least as determined to shut down her presidency at all costs
(including to the American people) as her predecessor’s.
On the other hand, Trump will
be a disaster if elected. His track record as a businessman is currently in the
black but it also includes a long list of failures from an airline to his own brand of vodka. One wonders how
many failures America can absorb under a Trump regime after eight disastrous
years of Bush followed by eight years of near lockdown with Obama and his
Teapots under the Dome. Trump will immediately engender mistrust from our
allies and confrontation from our current foes as this American version of Vladimir
Putin takes the field. And he has already dramatically polarized an
increasingly diverse America that in just a couple of decades will have no
single majority ethnicity.
That leaves the Storm….
I do agree with my classmate
that revolutions, unlike coups, take a long time. Transformations take even
longer. It is when the dominant paradigm of the status quo reaches its
expiration date and refuses to relinquish its hold that conflict arises.
Last Tuesday night as I listened to the increasingly anxious voices of the guardians of the status quo who refused to see the new reality that was being revealed in polling places across the northeast, it occurred to me that conflict and chaos may be the only way forward for America. We have rejected the soft revolution of Obama and now have turned down the
invitation from Sanders for a more direct and thoughtful revolution.
That leaves the Storm.
I shudder to think of what that might look like. But transformation is surely
coming. The only questions remaining are how, how soon and how furious the Storm.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Harry Scott Coverston
Orlando, Florida
If the unexamined life is not
worth living, surely an unexamined belief system, be it religious or political,
is not worth holding.
Most things worth considering
do not come in sound bites.
Do not be daunted by the
enormity of the world's grief. Do justly, now. Love mercy, now. Walk humbly
now. You are not obligated to complete the work, but neither are you free to
abandon it. – Rabbi Rami Shapiro, Wisdom of the Ages, Commentary on Micah
6:8
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 comments:
Harry, Unfortunately, we had the same situation with my Dad and FOX news. :(
What is going on now definitely points out Maslow's hierarchy of needs and our societies stance somewhere in the middle.
"One place I disagree with Bernie is his summation of Hillary’s qualifications. She is certainly qualified to run a government under the status quo system. But if the status quo is the problem, as I and many other furious revolutionaries see it, that is not an adequate answer to the problems we face. It is simply more of the same, a prolonging of the current agony." -Coverston The status quo IS the problem.
Hopefully we'll see a rainbow at the end of the journey ... Agape, Mike
Harry, I find your musing logical and yet scary. I DO take exception to your belief that Hillary will continue the status quo. I believe the brightest and most qualified woman to appear on the scene since women obtained the "right" to vote has an agenda that is intended to serve America well, especially the middle classes.Sadly, I fear that if we have a Congress with a similar attitude as Obama faced, she will be stopped at every turn. Still no reason to elect a sexist, racist, incompetent man who reminds too many of Hitler...
Post a Comment